10/100/1000BASE-T Gigabit Ethernet (RJ-45 connector)įull-size keyboard with 78 (U.S.) or 79 (ISO) keys, including 12 function keys, 4 arrow keys (inverted “T” arrangement). Mini DisplayPort output with support for DVI, VGA, and dual-link DVI (adapters sold separately). Support for Apple iPhone headset with microphone. Headphone/optical digital audio output (minijack). Support for extended desktop and video mirroring modes. Simultaneously supports full native resolution on the built-in display and up to a 30-inch display (2560 by 1600 pixels) on an external display. 
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M graphics processor with 512MB of GDDR5 memory
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M graphics processor with 512MB of GDDR5 memory
1920-by-1080 resolution with support for millions of colorsĢ.7GHz quad-core Intel Core i5 processor (Turbo Boost up to 3.2GHz) with 6MB 元 cacheĢ.9GHz quad-core Intel Core i5 processor (Turbo Boost up to 3.6GHz) with 6MB 元 cacheĬonfigurable to 3.1GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 (Turbo Boost up to 3.9GHz). 21.5-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit display with IPS technology. If you’re considering whether to buy the entry-level or the higher-end model, our Speedmark 8 results show that the $799 model was 25 percent faster overall, with the biggest gains being in MathematicaMark and Cinebench CPU, which were 78 percent and 53 percent faster, respectively, than the new $599 Mac mini. On the other hand, the previous high-end model, with its discreet AMD Radeon HD 6630M graphics, was faster on GPU-intensive tests, like Portal 2 (9 percent more frames per second) and Cinebench OpenGL (24 percent more frames per second). MathematicaMark was 78 percent faster on the new system, Cinebench CPU tests took 53 percent less time to complete, and HandBrake was 24 percent faster than the old model. The older system took nearly three times as long to complete our Photoshop action script.Īs you’d expect, processor-intensive tests that can use all four cores (and eight virtual cores, thanks to the Core i7’s Hyper Threading technology) showed the new high-end Mac mini to be much faster than the 2011 high-end Mac mini with a dual-core 2.5GHz Core i5 processor. The 2012 Mac mini was 68 percent faster and finished the Cinebench CPU test in half the time of the 2010 model. We also looked at the performance differences between the new low-end model and a mid-2010 entry-level Mac mini with a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor. The new Intel HD Graphics 4000 helped the 2012 low-end Mac mini beat last year’s system by 60 percent in the Cinebench OpenGL test and by 27 percent in Portal 2. In our testing, we found the new $599 Mac mini to be 31 percent faster overall than its predecessor.
0 kommentar(er)
